Skip to content

Compound Evidence Catalog

Scope

This catalog records compounds and exposures with reported activity on NLRP3, urate handling, or related pathways. It is an evidence-routing and experiment-design surface, not a recommended stack, prescribing guide, dosing schedule, or access guide.

Approved drugs appear only as research comparators. Evidence from another indication does not establish gout efficacy. Dietary availability, supplement availability, or a familiar production route does not establish adequate exposure, safety, target engagement, or benefit.

Species-gap rule: prefer human-cell potency when available and apply the cross-species standard in chembl-cross-check.md before translating rodent results.

Candidate evidence summary

The table records the highest relevant evidence class represented in the current dossier and the key unresolved translation question. Exact study design, material, concentration, and endpoint must be rechecked in the linked evidence home before an experiment uses the claim.

Candidate Evidence level Reported gout-relevant mechanism Current boundary Evidence home
BHB / ketone bodies In Vitro + Animal Model NLRP3 priming, potassium-efflux, and ASC-related effects Human gout exposure and simultaneous renal-urate effects remain unresolved BHB / ketones
Fasting Mechanistic Extrapolation Autophagy, AMPK/mTOR, endogenous ketone production Not a validated NLRP3 or acute-flare intervention NLRP3 exploit map
KPV In Vitro PepT1-related uptake and an NF-κB reporter effect in named intestinal/Jurkat systems Direct MSU activity, synovial exposure, and a gout route are unestablished KPV
BPC-157 Animal Model + Mechanistic Extrapolation Cytoprotection and nitric-oxide-related signaling Adjacent-model evidence does not establish gout efficacy BPC-157
Sulforaphane In Vitro + Animal Model Nrf2/NF-κB and NLRP3-related effects in MSU models Human gout exposure-response is unknown NLRP3 exploit map
Theaflavins In Vitro + Animal Model NLRP3–NEK7, inflammasome, and renal-transporter effects Human gout efficacy and free exposure are unknown Theaflavins
Houttuynia cordata polysaccharides In Vitro + Animal Model Complement and context-dependent inflammatory effects Exact material, likely intestinal delivery, and direct MSU effects remain unresolved Houttuynia
Oridonin In Vitro + Animal Model Covalent NLRP3 inhibition and inflammasome suppression Human gout exposure, selectivity, and safety remain open Oridonin
Exact RvD1 and MaR1 Animal Model + In Vitro Distinct MSU-model neuroimmune and Prdx5/AMPK/Nrf2-associated effects Human gout exposure and efficacy are unestablished; EPA/DHA precursors are a separate conversion experiment SPM pathway
Tart-cherry preparations Clinical Trial, preparation-specific Candidate xanthine-oxidase and inflammatory effects Preparation, exposure, and endpoint heterogeneity prevent a class-wide conclusion Gout deep dive
NAC / glutathione-axis perturbation In Vitro + Animal Model Redox and mitochondrial-ROS modulation upstream of NLRP3 Gout-relevant compartmental exposure and efficacy are unestablished NLRP3 exploit map
EGCG In Vitro + Animal Model NF-κB, proteasome, caspase-1, and IL-1-related effects Food and concentrated-extract exposures are not interchangeable; human gout efficacy is unknown EGCG
Limonene Animal Model Nrf2 and TLR4-related effects in an MSU model Human translation and exposure adequacy are unknown Cannabinoids / terpenes
Lactoferrin In Vitro + Animal Model in adjacent systems Material-specific iron, inflammatory, barrier, or mitophagy/pyroptosis hypotheses No direct MSU-gout multi-chokepoint effect is established; exact material and compartment must be tested separately Lactoferrin
Carnosine Animal Model Urate and NLRP3-related effects in hyperuricemia models Human gout exposure and serum-carnosinase effects remain open Carnosine
Eurycoma longifolia / Tongkat Ali Clinical Trial, endpoint-specific Reported hormone and urate-related effects Product identity, mechanism, and reproducibility must remain source-specific Androgen natural modulation
Quercetin In Vitro + Animal Model 5-LOX/LTB4, NF-κB, XO, and mixed ABCG2 effects Direct human gout efficacy and intestinal urate-flux effects are unmeasured ABCG2 modulators
Beta-caryophyllene Animal Model CB2/TLR4/NLRP3-related effects in MSU models Human gout translation and exposure remain unknown Cannabinoids / terpenes
Vitamin D / VDR signaling Mechanistic Extrapolation for gout VDR and NF-κB-related signaling A mechanistic link does not define a gout-specific target exposure NLRP3 exploit map
Disulfiram In Vitro + Clinical Trial in another indication GSDMD pore blockade Approved use does not establish a gout indication, regimen, or safety profile Disulfiram
Tranilast In Vitro + Animal Model; Clinical exposure in other indications NACHT-domain NLRP3 inhibition Human gout efficacy is unestablished NLRP3 exploit map
Fermented-food metabolites Mechanistic Extrapolation, material-specific Candidate autophagy, SPM, and microbiome-metabolite effects Presence in food does not establish delivered exposure or target engagement NLRP3 exploit map
Engineered luminal UOX, chassis unresolved Mechanistic Extrapolation Candidate local urate degradation Physiological flux, systemic effect, dose, safety, containment, and chassis remain unresolved Gut-lumen sink

Interaction hypotheses

ABCG2 and luminal UOX

Intestinal ABCG2 is one contributor to luminal urate supply, so its function is a study variable for the engineered-UOX hypothesis. Pharmacology assays identify several catalog compounds as substrates, inhibitors, or expression modulators, but those data do not establish an interaction with urate flux at the relevant exposure.

Compound Reported ABCG2 effect Evidence Experimental implication
Curcumin Functional BCRP/ABCG2 inhibition in vitro; selective intestinal BCRP inhibition reported in cynomolgus monkeys In Vitro + Animal Model; tested substrates were not urate Candidate inhibitor control; measure intestinal urate flux directly
Quercetin Substrate/inhibitor in pharmacology assays; transcriptional upregulation reported after repeated animal exposure In Vitro + Animal Model, context-dependent Separate acute function from expression and chronicity
EGCG Reduced mitoxantrone-assayed BCRP activity after exposure in MCF-7Tam cells; Yu's mouse phenotype reports renal Oat1/Oct1 and Urat1/Glut9, not ABCG2 in the primary abstract In Vitro + Animal Model, different systems and endpoints Measure free parent/metabolites, ABCG2 protein and attribution, and intestinal urate flux together
Genistein / soy isoflavones BCRP substrate/inhibitor signals In Vitro Food and concentrated-material exposures require separate controls

ABCG2 genotype, hormone state, exposure, intestinal segment, and chronicity are experimental strata. They do not identify a personalized combination or timing rule. Candidate inducer arms such as sulforaphane, fermentable-fiber-derived butyrate, and AhR-active indoles also require direct urate-flux testing.

Mechanistic overlap

The following clusters define factorial experiments, not combinations to use:

Cluster Candidates Question
Nrf2-related signaling Sulforaphane, quercetin, oridonin, limonene, and exact MaR1 Are effects redundant, additive, or context-dependent at matched target engagement?
NF-κB priming Sulforaphane, EGCG, quercetin, carnosine, curcumin; KPV as a separate uptake/priming conjecture Which exact materials reproduce under matched MSU exposure, and do any effects remain after mechanism attribution?
XO-related activity Tart-cherry preparations, quercetin, EGCG Does the combination exceed either arm after exposure is matched?
CP2 / NLRP3 assembly Oridonin, beta-caryophyllene, tranilast, dapansutrile, BHB Which molecular readout moves, and does node diversity translate to nonredundancy?
Resolution / cytoprotection Exact RvD1 and MaR1; BPC-157 as a separate adjacent repair lead Does an exact material change resolution or later repair independently of acute inflammasome suppression?
Autophagy Fasting-state biology, spermidine, trehalose, rapamycin Is autophagy target engagement causal for the gout-relevant endpoint?

No cluster is presumed additive. Test each arm against the same comparator before testing a prespecified interaction.

Safety interaction signals

These are study-design and exclusion-review signals, not instructions for starting, stopping, holding, monitoring, or combining a compound.

Signal Candidate combination or context Research consequence
Hepatic stress EGCG, disulfiram, concentrated curcumin, alcohol, acetaminophen Require compound-specific hepatic evidence and prespecified safety exclusions before combination testing
Bleeding / platelet effects Omega-3, EGCG, quercetin, anticoagulants, antiplatelets Treat concomitant therapy as a safety exclusion or stratification variable under clinical oversight
CYP3A4 interaction Quercetin, EGCG, oridonin, limonene with CYP3A4 substrates Confirm clinically relevant free exposure; in-vitro inhibition alone is insufficient
Disulfiram–ethanol reaction Disulfiram with any ethanol-containing exposure Exclude uncontrolled ethanol exposure from a disulfiram study design
Vitamin K / anticoagulation Vitamin K2 or natto with warfarin Treat as a known interaction context requiring clinical protocol ownership
Calcium handling Vitamin D exposure with thiazide therapy Prespecify calcium-related eligibility and safety endpoints in any relevant study

Conditional engineered luminal UOX

Engineered luminal UOX is not a supplement, available product, home-fermentation format, or dosing recommendation. Yeast, koji, and live biotherapeutic hosts are candidate configurations, not validated delivery routes. Parent-organism food or manufacturing history does not establish the safety, containment, activity, exposure, or efficacy of an engineered strain.

Required sequence:

  1. Build and characterize exact configurations.
  2. Establish a physiologically relevant reaction regime in validation §1.33.
  3. Test antioxidant loss and peroxide safety in §1.36.
  4. Measure functional urate disposal and only then test systemic outcomes.
  5. Compare chassis only under matched expression, localization, stability, containment, and safety conditions.

Experimental sequencing

  • Start from a stated gout weakness and a source-verified mechanistic prediction.
  • Verify exact material identity and relevant exposure.
  • Test a single candidate against a gout-relevant comparator before a combination.
  • Separate urate handling, inflammasome activity, resolution, and clinical outcomes.
  • Prespecify interaction risks, stopping rules, and a nonredundancy criterion.
  • Treat null, inverted, or exposure-limited results as reasons to revise or stop the hypothesis.

Research catalog only. It does not define clinical care.