Track: [Name]

1. Gout weakness

[Causal or operational weakness in gout. Link the canonical system map.]

2. Exploit hypothesis

[One falsifiable statement. Name the compartment, population, and expected effect.]

3. Proposed engineering

[Payload, modality, chassis or delivery route, and the reason each is necessary.]

4. Evidence by level

• Clinical Trial: [Directly relevant human evidence or none.]
• Animal Model: [Evidence or none.]
• In Vitro: [Evidence or none.]
• Computational: [Current exact-artifact COMP receipt or none.]
• Mechanistic Extrapolation: [Inference and its premises.]

5. Key assumptions

• [Assumption with a source anchor.]

6. Failure modes and safety constraints

• [Failure, consequence, and detection method.]

7. Cheapest discriminating experiment

[Smallest experiment that changes the decision. Link the protocol when defined.]

8. Pass / revise / kill criteria

• Pass: [Outcome.]
• Revise: [Outcome and allowed redirect.]
• Kill: [Outcome that stops this track.]

9. Status and next move

[Current state, unresolved gate, next action. Do not preserve a changelog here.]

10. What remains true if this track fails

[Reusable system knowledge, validated method, or surviving tracks.]

11. Research leads

Use only for a novel connection that is worth preserving but not ready for a committed falsification card. Research Conjecture is an epistemic status, not an evidence level.

Research conjecture — [short title]

Grounded premises: [Source-backed premises with evidence levels and provenance.]

Novel leap: [Exact untested connection; state that direct evidence is absent.]

Why it matters: [Upside if true.]

Discriminating observation: [Cheapest observation or experiment that advances, redirects, or kills the lead.]